Other Free Encyclopedias » Medicine Encyclopedia » Aging Healthy - Part 4 » Technology and Aging - Medical Technologies, Ecological And Assistive Technology For The Disabled, Information Technology And Older Adults, Conclusion

Technology and Aging - Conclusion

age nursing assistive care journal health

The future of technology is vast and largely unforeseeable. Many of the innovations described in this entry were unimagined in the 1980s or 1990s, and undoubtedly future developments will be equally surprising. Some features will certainly become a more important part of the technological solutions applied to everyday aspects of aging. The increasing use of ‘‘intelligent’’ systems, and eventually of robotics, seems assured. Even now, technologies such as specially designed global positioning systems, to reduce wandering among Alzheimer’s patients, and intelligent wheelchairs are being tested. Further research is needed to understand the limitations of technology. For example, an increased dependence upon assistive technology should not replace rehabilitation therapy, and no number of ‘‘smart’’ devices can assure complete independence for an older person with advanced dementia. In addition, the broader use of computers for day-to-day tasks, such as shopping and banking, has yet to resolve problems related to the reliability of information on the Internet, privacy concerns, access to technology for low-income persons, and the needs of the disabled elderly.

EMILY M. AGREE

BIBLIOGRAPHY

AGREE, E. M., and FREEDMAN, V. A. ‘‘Incorporating Assistive Devices into Community-Based Long-Term Care: An Analysis of the Potential for Substitution and Supplementation.’’ Journal of Aging and Health 12, no. 3(2000): 426–450.

BRANDT, E. N., and POPE, A. M., eds. Enabling America: Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1997.

BUCUR, A., and KWON, S. ‘‘Computer Hardware and Software Interfaces: Why the Elderly Are Underrepresented as Computer Users.’’ Cyber Psychology and Behavior 2, no. 6 (1999): 535–543.

BUCUR, A.; RENOLD, C.; and HENKE, M. ‘‘How Do Older Netcitizens Compare with Their Younger Counterparts?’’ Cyber Psychology and Behavior 2, no. 6 (1999): 505–513.

CHARNESS, N., and HOLLEY, P. ‘‘Computer Interface Issues for Health Self-care: Cognitive and Perceptual Constraints.’’ In Human Factors Interventions for the Health Care of Older Adults. Edited by W. A. Rogers and A. D. Fisk. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum 2001.

COVINGTON, G. A. ‘‘Cultural and Environmental Barriers to Assistive Technology: Why Assistive Devices Don’t Always Assist.’’ In Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective. Edited by D. B. Gray, et al. Baltimore: P. H. Brookes, 1998.

DEATRICK, D. ‘‘Senior-Med: Creating a Network to help Manage Medications.’’ Generations (Fall 1997): 59–60.

GITLIN, L. N. ‘‘Why Older People Accept or Reject Assistive Technology.’’ Generations 19, no. 1 (1995).

LENHART, A. Who’s Not Online. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet and American Life Project, 2000.

MCCONATHA, D. ‘‘Aging Online: Toward a Theory of E-Quality’’ In The Older Adult and the World Wide Web. Edited by Roger Morrell. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, in press.

MCCONATHA, D.; MCCONATHA, J. T.; and DERMIGNY, J. ‘‘The Use of Interactive Computer Service to Enhance the Quality of Life for Long-term Care Residents.’’ The Gerontologist 34, no. 4 (1994): 553–556.

MEAD, G. E.; PENDLETON, N.; PENDLETON, D. E.; HORAN, M. A.; and NUALA, BENT. ‘‘High Technology Medical Interventions: What do Older People Want?’’ Journal of the American Geriatric Society 45, no. 11 (1997): 1409–1411.

MEAD, S. E.; BATSAKES, P.; FISK, A. D.; and MYKITYSHYN, A. ‘‘Application of Cognitive Theory to Training and Design Solutions for Age Related Computer Use.’’ International Journal of Behavioral Development 23, no. 3 (1999): 553–573.

MORRELL, R. W.; MAYHORN, C. B.; and BENNETT, J. ‘‘Older Adults Online in the Internet Century.’’ In Older Adults, Health Information, and the World Wide Web. Edited by R. W. Morrell. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002.

PIRKL, J. J. Transgenerational Design: Products for an Aging Population. Florence, Ky. : Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1994.

RUSSELL, C. ‘‘The Haves and the Want-Nots.’’ American Demographics 20 (April 1998): 10–12.

SHERER, M. ‘‘The Impact of Personal Computers on the Lives of Nursing Home Residents.’’ Physical and Occupation Therapy in Geriatrics 14 (1996): 13–31.

STOECKLE, J. D., and LORCH, S. ‘‘Why Go to See the Doctor? Care Goes from Office to Home as Technology Divorces Function from Geography.’’ International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 13, no. 4 (1998): 537–546.

STORY, M. F. ‘‘Maximizing Usability: The Principles of Universal Design.’’ Assistive Technology 10, no. 1 (1998): 4–12.

WILSON, C. B. ‘‘The Impact of Medical Technologies on the Future of Hospitals.’’ British Medical Journal 319 (1999): 1–3.

THANATOLOGY

See DEATH AND DYING; DEATH ANXIETY; FUNERAL AND MEMORIAL PRACTICES

[back] Technology and Aging - Information Technology And Older Adults

User Comments

The following comments are not guaranteed to be that of a trained medical professional. Please consult your physician for advice.

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or